Nelson's Column
Link To Us Bookmark
February
New Photography Laws 18th February 2009
Will they stop you taking pictures like this in London?
During the incredible few days of snow this month I went for a wander in St James's park armed with my camera. Amongst the myriad snowmen, dog walkers and - believe it or not - skiers who were the principal targets of my snapping, I took a nice shot of two policemen walking towards Buckingham Palace. Had the snow come a couple of weeks later, I might well have just broken the law.

You see, from 16th February anyone taking photographs of policemen or soldiers could be viewed as committing a criminal offence. Tourists: better think twice now about catching the Changing of the Guard or the iconic British bobby on film.

The reason for this confusion is the implementation of Section 76 of the 2008 Counter Terrorism Act which criminalises (with a punishment of up to 10 years in prison) anyone "eliciting, publishing or communicating information" relating to past or present members of the armed forces, intelligence services and police officers, which is "likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism".

Professional photographers are up in arms about the whole charade: not that it will curtail their moonlighting for al-Qaeda but that police will no doubt use the law as a way of suppressing evidence. Consequently, more than 200 snappers convened at New Scotland Yard on the day the law came into force to take pictures of the fuzz in what they saw as a demonstration of their simple right.

But it's not just the professionals who could be affected. In today's iWorld of digital mastery, everyone has at least a camera phone and the capacity to "publish" their snaps on blogs or social networking sites such as Flickr and Facebook.

In short, the new law could have a huge impact on our freedom of taking photographs in London. I have already mentioned the traditional policemen and the bearskins of the Irish Guards, but the possibilities do not stop there. What about the Tower of London's famous 'Beefeater' Yeoman Wardens, all of whom are retired from the British Armed Forces? Or the policemen on horseback in Hyde Park? Or pop singer Sting?!

There are implications for sporting events, too. Football games require a strong police presence, while the 2012 Olympics will no doubt be heavily patrolled precisely because of the enormous scope for terrorism. Are we really going to impose a photography ban on the thousands of sporting fans who will flock to London for the Games from all around the world?

Will I, a law abiding 27 year old, put one foot in prison by posting online pictures of my friends James and Alex - a soldier and a policeman respectively? And supposing James tells me in good faith that he's going back to serve a term of duty in Iraq - and then I absent-mindedly "publish" this information on Facebook, whereby alerting potential extremists (of which there are so many amongst my friends) to this change of UK foreign policy? Such a disclosure is "likely to be useful" in inciting a potential act of terrorism, but can hardly amount to a plot.

The storm sees the principles of one's civil liberties on one side pitted against the protection of national welfare and safety on the other. It's interesting to note that many people don't appreciate that it was technically illegal to take photos in airports and the Underground prior to 16th February. I made the mistake of taking my digital SLR to the new Terminal 5 at Heathrow last year and was accosted by two officers and forced to delete the photos in front of their eyes. And yet days later I was taking pictures of Moscow airport, sans souci, while a year previously I snapped a whole group of willing Gendarmes while watching the Tour de France.

We can go round in circles arguing the cases for and against but sometimes it helps to simplify things. From a personal viewpoint, I am not really in the habit of photographing policemen or soldiers in the UK and if I did, I'm confident that I would be cleared of any terroristic wrongdoing.

I also can't see Beefeaters or the Irish Guards causing too much fuss and forcing tourists to delete their memory cards, while many policemen have already said they will cast a blind eye. Those who are in line to suffer are professional photographers covering rallies or demonstrations for whom it is largely unavoidable to photograph men in uniform.

The law obviously brings about a whole grey area which will no doubt cause a few confrontations, but if we're talking about protecting national security at a time when any attack would be crippling then it's for the better. If this can prevent another 7/7 then surely it's a good thing, despite its confusion, and in reality, I imagine very little will change. I just wouldn't recommend any Brazilian (or bearded) tourists take pictures of policemen on Stockwell tube, that's all.
A City Climb
After a bit of a polish to its golden orb, The Monument has reopened to the public so we can now all pant our way up its 311 steps to look out over the City. Restoration work is carried out on the structure every 100 years or so to keep it in tiptop shape; the last time being in 1888. Christopher Wren and Robert Hooke designed The Monument to commemorate the Great Fire of London in 1666 and it stands proud as the world's highest isolated stone column at 61 metres. Worth a peek from the top!
A Libretto from The Sun
Shock, horror probe – the Royal Opera House does low culture! Is this a move to entice a new audience of tabloid readers through its hallowed doors or do opera's bigwigs really think they can turn the sensationalised story of the late glamour model Anna Nicole Smith's marriage to a rich – very rich actually – businessman into a tragic love story? The kind usually gracing the prestigious Covent Garden stage? It would seem so. "It's not going to be a horrible, sleazy evening", said director of opera Elaine Padmore. Oh, you do disappoint!
A Drop in the Ocean at Chelsea
While the rest of London looks forward to the next 2-for-1 voucher at Pizza Express, Chelsea Football Club did not seem overly concerned with a loss of £65.7 million for the last financial year. It would seem that the words 'credit' and 'crunch' are not overly familiar to the likes of chief exec Peter Kenyon and if star players John Terry and Frank Lampard had to shave a couple of quid of their expenses, it probably wouldn't be too much of a strain. Still, the club's loss is around £9 million less than it was last year so perhaps Abramovich is encouraging a little belt tightening - although hefty payouts to sacked managers can't help matters much.
October 2009
26th October
Posties Strike a Chord
26th October
Frieze Still Pleases
September 2009
26th September
A River Runs Through It
23rd September
Blogging is Best
August 2009
26th August
When Saturday comes
22nd August
Bring on the Bikes
July 2009
27th July
Against the Clock
20th July
View for a thrill
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
18th February
New Photography Laws
12th February
Glitz and the Pitts
January 2009
27th January
Setting the Standard
21st January
Too Much for Posh Nosh?
December 2008
23rd December
January is on the Horizon
20th December
Merry Christmas
November 2008
26th November
All The World's A Stage
20th November
Surviving the Crunch
October 2008
24th October
Boris v Jingjing
17th October
Soaps in Pole Position
September 2008
August 2008
May 2008
April 2008
23rd April
By George
11th April
Back to the 80s
February 2008
20th February
Dark, Satanic Turnmills
6th February
A Diamond in the Drink
January 2008
21st January
People Wanted for Plinth
14th January
Boo! Hiss!
December 2007
28th December
Tate That - A Hirst for Art
20th December
Christmas Shopping
November 2007
27th November
Mind the Gap
26th November
London On A Tray
October 2007
26th October
Leaving the Station
14th October
The Sky's the Limit
September 2007
August 2007
24th August
Heathrow under Siege
17th August
Gormless
10th August
Losing Face
June 2007
March 2007
23rd March
So, Another Magazine
16th March
Avoiding iContact
February 2007
December 2006
September 2006
May 2006
26th May
Curvaceous Border
12th May
Vegging Out
February 2006
January 2006
20th January
February Sales
20th January
Moby Sick
13th January
Glass Half Full
3rd January
Three Cheers for the Tube Station Workers
December 2005
22nd December
January Bites
16th December
A Remarkable Year
September 2005
July 2005
29th July
Moving On From 7/7
22nd July
Get loaded in the park
15th July
Victoire!!
June 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
30th December
Party Pooper
23rd December
The Second Battle of Trafalgar
16th December
Sadie's Year
November 2004
28th November
Ripper-Watch
21st November
Kinky Boots
14th November
Smoked out
October 2004
22nd October
Yuppie Meal
15th October
Fines of Fury
8th October
No Twist in the Turner
September 2004
17th September
Battleships, bloodsports and Batman
10th September
Clique Week
3rd September
Return of the Bard
August 2004
 
Link to New Photography Laws
To link to this page from your website use this code.
 
 
The link will appear on your page as:
 
Sponsor
Our favourite London hotels
May Fair Hotel
Luxury Hotels
 
In Trafalgar Square
20% off
 
At Liverpool Street
50% off
 
At Green Park
35% off
 
Near Covent Garden
30% off
 
Cavendish Hotel
Mid-range Hotels
 
Near Parliament
35% off
 
Near National Gallery
47% off
 
Near Tower Bridge
35% off
 
In Little Venice
40% off
 
Discounted theatre tickets
Chicago
57% off
 
29% off
 
42% off
 
56% off
 
47% off
 
38% off
 
Diner & Theatre Deals
Oliver
from £24.50
 
from £29.00
 
from £32.50
 
from £42.50
 
from £45.00
 
from £27.50
 
London Sightseeing
London Eye
10% off
 
10% off
 
10% off
 
from £8.50
 
from £25.00
 
10% off
 
LondonTown.com has special discounts every week. The amount of discount will vary depending on the dates you are coming and how far in advance you book. All discounts are subject to availability.
Recently viewed Favourites
Recently viewed